Crop insurance-program cost and performance data are available on a crop-year basis. USDA, Risk Management Agency (RMA) program data are available by crop year and reinsurance year, historical and most-current years. ERS does not include crop-insurance data in its Government-payments tables. ERS Government-payments data are reported on a calendar-year basis, rather than the fiscal-year basis used by the Congressional Budget Office. Farm Income and Wealth Statistics, Government Payments provide an interactive database on direct Government payments by program for the United States and individual States. USDA, Economic Research Service farm income data includes calendar-year data, historical and forecast, on direct Government payments. Additionally, index plans and supplemental policy endorsements have gained popularity, in terms of acreage covered, in recent years and have partly contributed to rising premiums and subsidies.ĭownload higher resolution chart (2641 pixels by 1325, 330 dpi)ĭownload chart data in Excel format. Following the introduction of revenue-based insurance policies in the 1990s, their use increased to cover the largest share of enrolled acres. With prices rising again in 2021, premiums and subsidies have followed. These expenditures include support to crop-insurance companies for delivery and underwriting, as well as subsidies for farmer premiums.Īs prices for several major commodities fell from their peaks in 2012-13, premiums and subsidy expenditures correspondingly dropped, since premium calculations depend in part on expected prices and subsidies are a set percentage of the premium. Under the 2018 Farm Act, crop-insurance-program expenditures were projected to comprise almost 9 percent of total outlays over 2019-23. Details on food and nutrition-assistance-program spending can be found at ERS Ag and Food Statistics: Charting the Essentials, Food Security and Nutrition Assistance.Ĭrop insurance. Mandatory nutrition-program spending was projected to account for more than 75 percent of 2018 Farm Act outlays. Four policy areas dominate projected spending under the 2018 Farm Act: Many research and rural-development programs are funded in this way.ĬBO projections include only programs authorized with mandatory funding in the Farm Act. Once program expenditures reach the level appropriated for that year, no additional funds can be spent unless Congress provides new appropriations. Programs authorized with discretionary funding may be funded up to the level provided by legislation, but Congress may change the funding level each year for these programs. Examples of Farm Act programs provided with mandatory funding include the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) as well as most commodity and conservation programs.ĭiscretionary funding. Congress can alter mandatory-funding levels at any time through new legislation, but there is no automatic reconsideration during the span of the Farm Act. Government costs under these programs may vary from year to year, depending on program-participation levels and economic conditions. Spending is not constrained by annual limits. Programs authorized with mandatory funding are provided funds as needed (or to a statutory level) through the Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) and are not subject to annual appropriations decisions by Congress. The 2018 Farm Act authorizes two kinds of program funding: View OFA’s national and individual state pie charts for more information on how states used their TANF and MOE funds in FY 2017.Download higher resolution chart (1814 pixels by 1536, 330 dpi)ĭownload chart data in Excel format. From FY 2016 to FY 2017, the amount of funds used for basic assistance and child care decreased (by $314 million and $110 million, respectively) while the amount used for work, education, and training activities increased by $444 million -however this was reflective of an increase in only a few states. OFA’s interactive map shows the distribution of this spending by state. 27 states used less than half of their TANF and MOE funds on the combination of basic assistance work, education, and training activities and child care.16.1 percent was used for child care (including funds transferred to the Child Care Development Fund).10.5 percent was used for work, education, and training activities and.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |